Conclusion: HADS seems to be a better option for anxiety and depression assessment than SAS/SDS in PsA patients.Ĭopyright: All rights reserved. SAS or SDS score presented less correlation with clinical features of PsA patients, which illuminated that only SAS score was positively associated with duration of psoriasis ( p = 0.030). In addition, a positive correlation of HADS-A score with patients’ global assessment (PGA) ( p = 0.022) and fatigue scores ( p = 0.028) was discovered, and HADS-D score was positively associated with PGA score ( p = 0.019). The consumption of time for HADS assessment was shorter than that for SAS/SDS assessment ( p < 0.001). However, different results were observed in grading the severity of anxiety by HADS-D and SDS ( p = 0.009), and no correlation was observed between HADS-D and SDS scores ( p = 0.138). The rates of depression were similar by HADS-D and SDS (27.1 vs. The Spearman test also disclosed that HADS-A score was positively associated with SAS score ( p <0.001). 21.4%, p = 0.424), and there was no difference in classifying the severity of anxiety by HADS-A and SAS ( p = 0.347). Results: Similar results were observed in detecting the rate of anxiety by HADS-A and SAS (27.1 vs. HADS-A and SAS were used to evaluate the anxiety of PsA patients, while HADS-D and SDS were used to evaluate the depression of PsA patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected after enrollment. Methods: A total of 70 PsA patients were enrolled. Background: This study aimed to compare the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS) in evaluating anxiety and depression in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |